On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 11:45:17PM +0000, Thom May wrote: > the header files in include/arch/*/* currently have very generic names, like > "dso.h". I got bit by this earlier when trying to specify the location of > OpenSSL, which also ships a dso.h > Would anyone have any objections to renaming them as > apr_*_private.h/apr_private_*.h ? > I volunteer to do it, just wondering if people have reasons not too?
Drop the "private" part. They're already private based on where they're located, so there isn't a need to further qualify them. I'm also assuming that we can manage to avoid conflicts between the arch-specific and the public file names (since we manage both namespaces). IOW: +1 on using apr_*.h +0.2 on using apr_priv_*.h +0 on using apr_private_*.h -0 on using apr_*_private.h Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
