On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 11:59:50PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote: >... > My argument against using "apr_*.h" would be twofold.
Fair enough... both points make sense. >... > and for shits and giggles, I'll even add: > > +0 on using apr_arch_*.h > -0 on using apr_os_*.h [too confusing, since for example apr_os_file_t > would *not* be defined in apr_os_file_io.h] +0.5 and -0, respectively. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
