Brane, I am certain you experienced an anomaly, perhaps a broken version of rebase.exe. I say this, having compared the sizes of the Apache 2.0.44 distributed iconv tree to the latest *release* build of the same. (Or perhaps you were looking at *debug* builds.)
In any case, don't expect a change on the file size front, and this also indicates we need to quit rebasing apr-iconv, using rebase to generate the list of offsets and passing that list file to link (just as we do for libapriconv.dll and other modules.) Should be simple enough, I'll get to it in just a bit. Bill At 10:21 AM 3/7/2003, Branko Čibej wrote: >This would get a big +1 from me. If I understand correctly, it would >also make the size of statically linked apr-iconv .so modules much >smaller, which is a Goodness. > >-- >Brane Čibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
