William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >Brane, I am certain you experienced an anomaly, perhaps a broken >version of rebase.exe. I say this, having compared the sizes of the >Apache 2.0.44 distributed iconv tree to the latest *release* build of >the same. (Or perhaps you were looking at *debug* builds.) > Actually, I was looking at the apr-iconv modules linked with the static apr and apr-iconv, not the DLLs. For some reason, rebase doesn't create .dbg files in that case. Don't ask me why not, but there it is. So it doesn't strip debug symbols, either.
So no, this isn't a problem for anything linked with the DLLs -- therefore, not for Apache. It is a problem for Subversion at this point in time, but I think we can live with it for now. >In any case, don't expect a change on the file size front, and this also >indicates we need to quit rebasing apr-iconv, using rebase to generate >the list of offsets and passing that list file to link (just as we do for >libapriconv.dll and other modules.) Should be simple enough, I'll get >to it in just a bit. > >Bill > >At 10:21 AM 3/7/2003, Branko ÃÅibej wrote: > > >>This would get a big +1 from me. If I understand correctly, it would >>also make the size of statically linked apr-iconv .so modules much >>smaller, which is a Goodness. >> >>-- >>Brane ÃÅibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/ >> >> > > > > -- Brane Äibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
