On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:10:26PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Comments?? :)
Wow, this code is already broken on LP64 platforms (sizeof(sem_t *) != sizeof(int)) and has dodgy error handling (#17186) - why add even more features? joe
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:10:26PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Comments?? :)
Wow, this code is already broken on LP64 platforms (sizeof(sem_t *) != sizeof(int)) and has dodgy error handling (#17186) - why add even more features? joe