Joe Orton wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:10:26PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Comments?? :) > > Wow, this code is already broken on LP64 platforms (sizeof(sem_t *) != > sizeof(int)) and has dodgy error handling (#17186) - why add even more > features? >
The sizeof issue is known and noted already... the fix, of course, is correct what filedes is... I'll look for your patch. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
