William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I wouldn't mind an rpm spec file for 0.9.6 either. +1
There is an outstanding vote in httpd v2.0's STATUS for fixing the spec file in httpd v2.0.49 (v2.1.0-dev has been fixed). What I'm keen to see though is a separation of RPM packages, one for apr, one for apr-util, and one for httpd, depends though on whether httpd v2.0 can build with apr out the tree (I've never tried).
Hopefully I'll have a set of spec files ready for APR v1.0.0, and then a set of spec files ready for httpd v2.0.50.
Regards, Graham --
