William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
-1 for apr-util / apr-iconv.

Curt has identified a very significant issue; I will comment
to that thread.  Since the 'fix' should be fairly trivial,
I think we should next release a version that deals with
iconv/*.so's.


I do not believe this is a valid reason to hold up these releases. This is not a regression from any previous versions. This release fixes many other issues. Once this issue is fixed, we can do another release.


-Paul

Reply via email to