I have done a search against pmc@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Justin 'amended' his +1 to include 1.0.2. Nobody else did so (some explicitly did not vote on this item).
I'm explicitly voting -1 against a 1.0.2 release. Curt's issue is explicitly harmful to apr-iconv users. There is a (rather large) breakage that seems has been deliberately ignored by an overeager RM.
Paul explicitly posted a tally yesterday afternoon and you didn't bring this up then. Nowhere can I find you saying -1 for apr-iconv, so your -1 is news to me and probably to Paul as well.
Additionally, I maintain that this isn't a regression. So, my +1 still stands. Yes, others could have been more explicit as to what they were voting for - but I feel Paul followed the process in good faith and should be afforded a benefit of a doubt and not be accused of deliberately ignoring breakage. Accusing him of malicious intent is unfair. -- justin
