Cliff Woolley wrote: > > Anyway +1 to the approach of keeping what we have and pushing quickly to > apr-iconv 1.1.0 to fix the problem at hand. I don't much care whether > apr-iconv 1.0.2 continues to exist in the meanwhile or not. +1 to keep > it, +0 to remove it. >
+1 for pushing quickly (but not toooo quickly :) ) -0 for keeping, +0 for removing. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else."
