Because nobody added it? (It would be apr_brigade_save).
right. but is there a reason why does it exist as ap_save_brigade and not apr_brigade_save?
I'm actually more concerned with adding an apr_brigade_consume; it's used in the ssl stack already. The fact is that some folks reading a brigade will simply consume the buckets contained within, and it's sub-optimal to leave them lying about.
but it's not the same functionality, no?
Anybody can tell why there is no apr_save_brigade in libapr?
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
