Actually - if you are at all familiar with kernel development, you would be aware that this is a fundamentally broken construct that leads to resource leakage and, generally, problematic behaviors.
Nothing will ever be added to 1.2.x, the next release with 'new features' or API entry points will be 1.3, and the next release that deletes old features (deprecated ones) will be 2.0 per our versioning rules. Locke wrote: > Hi There, > > I wonder why there is no function with name like ap_cancel_thread() to > wrap up TerminateThread() of NT ? > > Is there any specific consideration leading to current APR1.2.7 don't > offer such support ? > > Thanks, > -Kelvin > > . >
