Joe Orton wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 08:29:10AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > The performance implications of not doing buffered reads just *kills* > > our server - so we need to do something and adding buffering lessens > > the load quite dramatically. In our situation, we couldn't care less > > about modifying the file - we only care to optimize the read-only case > > - and I believe that code is just fine and stable. Though I guess I'd > > prefer we fix the problems with buffering if they do exist. > > > > Would you be concerned if we added APR_BUFFERED to APR_DBM_DBMODE_RO > > for sdbm? -- justin > > No, that sounds fine, or just moving your change up inside the !(flags & > APR_WRITE) condition so that all apr_sdbm_* users benefit equally. >
+1 -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
