On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:09:43AM -0500, William Rowe wrote: > > Given Joe's stance (which I'm taking as a veto) I think removing it and > > starting a seperate "module" within apr's repo would make the most sense > > and should remove the veto from 1.3 - making everyone happy. > > I definately don't want to see this handled piecemeal. Please leave it in > place, and Joe please reconsider your veto.
I have not vetoed anything. In principle I have no objection to putting the SSL code in apr-util. As I said originally: I would prefer to see the code develop in a branch until it reaches a suitable state for inclusion in the trunk/a release. joe
