Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:09:43AM -0500, William Rowe wrote: >>> Given Joe's stance (which I'm taking as a veto) I think removing it and >>> starting a seperate "module" within apr's repo would make the most sense >>> and should remove the veto from 1.3 - making everyone happy. >> I definately don't want to see this handled piecemeal. Please leave it in >> place, and Joe please reconsider your veto. > > I have not vetoed anything. In principle I have no objection to putting > the SSL code in apr-util. As I said originally: I would prefer to see > the code develop in a branch until it reaches a suitable state for > inclusion in the trunk/a release.
I assume my suggestion to remove the code into a separate module would also satisfy you?
