Brian J. France wrote: > > On May 30, 2007, at 1:50 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> I'd like to roll a tarball tomorrow about noon here in the midwest us, >> for 0.9 and 1.2 of apr, apr-util and apr-iconv. Iconv - since everyone >> I've asked to test the latest agrees that the 64-bittedness issues are >> gone. So patch away, but please don't destabilize the branches. > > Any chance of getting this in? > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40apr.apache.org/msg18111.html
Note there are 3 implementations (unix/os2/netware) and your patch isn't terribly specific :) This is a little more than trivial. Bill
