On May 30, 2007, at 4:21 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

Brian J. France wrote:

On May 30, 2007, at 1:50 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to roll a tarball tomorrow about noon here in the midwest us, for 0.9 and 1.2 of apr, apr-util and apr-iconv. Iconv - since everyone I've asked to test the latest agrees that the 64-bittedness issues are
gone.  So patch away, but please don't destabilize the branches.

Any chance of getting this in?

http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40apr.apache.org/msg18111.html

Note there are 3 implementations (unix/os2/netware) and your patch isn't
terribly specific :)  This is a little more than trivial.

Something like this:

  http://www.brianfrance.com/software/apache/apr.file_io.diff

os2 just includes the unix version.

Brian



Reply via email to