On May 30, 2007, at 4:21 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Brian J. France wrote:
On May 30, 2007, at 1:50 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to roll a tarball tomorrow about noon here in the
midwest us,
for 0.9 and 1.2 of apr, apr-util and apr-iconv. Iconv - since
everyone
I've asked to test the latest agrees that the 64-bittedness
issues are
gone. So patch away, but please don't destabilize the branches.
Any chance of getting this in?
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40apr.apache.org/msg18111.html
Note there are 3 implementations (unix/os2/netware) and your patch
isn't
terribly specific :) This is a little more than trivial.
Something like this:
http://www.brianfrance.com/software/apache/apr.file_io.diff
os2 just includes the unix version.
Brian