Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 08:15:49PM -0300, Davi Arnaut wrote: >> Same machine, now with -n: > > Thanks. Was the last line omitted from the results for Solaris which > you posted, or was it really a NULL result list?
Probably omitted -- cut-and-pasted from chat log. > I don't think this provides any reason to change the APR resolver code. > Ubuntu systems may be a bit schizophrenic about whether ::1 exists, > depending on whether your app uses AI_ADDRCONFIG or not, but it seems to > be by design. > > The testsockets.c problem is certainly not new, I don't see why it > should block a release. That code has always been pretty fragile. +1
