On May 16, 2008, at 10:43 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I am assuming that this is NOT with the latest apr-1.3 HEAD
code. Can you confirm that with the latest, all is well?
Right - these issues were pre-patch. Once you applied r656722,
all is well now.
woot!
Based on Roy's legitimately rabid reaction to the cruft that blows
into his simple application linkage, I believe we should solve the
ldap issue before rolling 1.3.0 since there is a semantic build
syntax change even though it remains binary compatible. I'd hate
to suggest that patch during a subversion bump.
+1
