Hummm, surprise! The patch doesn't work. Definitively, MinGW+MSYS is like the ugly duckling, but instead of becoming a swan is more likely to become a roast chicken in one of the the Microsoft's ovens.
Best regards, Pablo. 2008/12/24 carlo.bramix <[email protected]> > Hello, > I believe that APR was never supported very well on mingw+msys. At least, > it was not in the last two years since I'm using it. > But hopefully (evidently, you have not checked APR carefully enough!) a > full mingw+msys port already exists in bugzilla: > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46175 > > let's hope that project leaders will accept it so that it will be committed > soon... > > Sincerely, > > Carlo Bramini. > > > ---------- Initial Header ----------- > > From : "Pablo Beltran" [email protected] > To : "Paul Querna" [email protected] > Cc : [email protected] > Date : Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:33:34 +0100 > Subject : Re: Apache *PORTABLE* Runtime? > > > When it was working... were there dinosaurs jumping on the prairies? > > > > i would send patches whether I could write them, but the complexity is > too > > big for me. > > > > Regards, > > Pablo. > > > > 2008/12/24 Paul Querna <[email protected]> > > > > > Pablo Beltran wrote: > > > > > >> Ha, ha ,ha. Not to the MinGW+MSYS platform! > > >> > > >> > > > Then send patches. > > > > > > At one time APR was working on MinGW+MSYS (although it still was > > > non-trivial to compile), it is possible there has been a regression > since > > > the last time we had it working on there. > > > > > > -Paul > > > > > > > > > >
