Re: state of the release candidate

[Jim Jagielski]

On Jun 2, 2009, at 6:07 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:

On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 10:50 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

1 from bojan,
jim and I'm a little confused why a not-a-regression test module flaw
would halt a release

Practical reasons only. We already had fixes committed and it looked

like APR was going to be re-rolled, so doing APU as well seemed like the

right thing to do.

+1... best version available and all that.