Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:33 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> Shouldn't this be == above like in the case for the output file >> descriptors? >> >> Sure looks that way. > > Worthy of a quick release (if it's the cause of fd leaks)? > > If we combine that with APU's --libs thing and the (uncommitted) DSO > race patches, maybe we should roll 1.3.6/1.3.8 ASAP?
Sure, I'm happy to T&R roll this Friday provided nobody objects. Or, give this another week and address other existing/incoming bugs with a bugfix release? We are just shy of 80, counting NEEDINFO. FYI, did a fun query, just choose Search: APR instead of looking at the product codes APR*. Some interesting things fall out :) Unsure that most off them are actually interesting to us. Bill
