William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>   [X] apr 2.0 must support a complete ldap interface
>       (revert r799085 for now, reapply upon 2.0.0 release,
>       or rm ldap/ if not completed)

There is no point making it more difficult for the LDAP people to get
this work done.

If we are ready for a v2.0.0 release, then this makes sense. Not before.

Regards,
Graham
--

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to