Graham Leggett wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> The LDAP proponents have all agreed over a year ago that this should be >> done. > > Exactly, and that hasn't changed since then. > > Right now I am ENOTIME in a big way - I have lots of changes to make to > other components right now, and my accountant needs to be made happy. > The big-LDAP-fix is going to need a solid block of my time, and that is > not going to happen until after August is finished. > > Your change just made my job even harder, because I would have first > needed to reverse engineer why the LDAP build broke, picking through our > custom apr-specific build scripts to isolate the file that changed, and > then follow the history to find out why.
The apr_ldap build has not broken. Consumers who expected apr to provide libldap bindings are missing -lldap (-llber) now. That is easily remedied by those who want to play with such things.
