Bill, [email protected] schrieb: > Author: wrowe > Date: Fri Dec 18 05:20:42 2009 > New Revision: 892141 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892141&view=rev > Log: > Netware changes; always include netware.h/library.h for > whatever local functions or types would be aliased, in > a public manner, and drop very stale references to flavors > which should not be in common use. > > It's not necessary to exclude by platform, is it? > > Modified: > apr/apr/trunk/include/apr.hnw > apr/apr/trunk/include/arch/netware/apr_private.h > > Modified: apr/apr/trunk/include/arch/netware/apr_private.h > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/trunk/include/arch/netware/apr_private.h?rev=892141&r1=892140&r2=892141&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- apr/apr/trunk/include/arch/netware/apr_private.h (original) > +++ apr/apr/trunk/include/arch/netware/apr_private.h Fri Dec 18 05:20:42 2009 > @@ -16,28 +16,13 @@ > > /* > * Note: > - * This is the windows specific autoconf-like config file > - * which unix would create at build time. > + * This is the netware-specific autoconf-like config file > + * which unix creates at ./configure time. > */ > > -#ifdef NETWARE > - > #ifndef APR_PRIVATE_H > #define APR_PRIVATE_H > > -/* Include the public APR symbols, include our idea of the 'right' > - * subset of the Windows.h header. This saves us repetition. > - */ > -#include "apr.h" > - > -#include <sys/types.h> > -#include <stddef.h> > -#include <stdio.h> > -#include <stdlib.h> > -#include <time.h> > -#include <library.h> > -#include <netware.h> > - > /* Use this section to define all of the HAVE_FOO_H > * that are required to build properly. > */ > @@ -71,19 +56,10 @@ > #define HAVE_WRITEV 1 > > #define HAVE_GETPASS_R 1 > -/* > - * check for older NDKs which have only the getpassword() function. > - */ > -#include <ndkvers.h> > -#if (CURRENT_NDK_THRESHOLD < 709060000) > -#define getpass_r getpassword > -#endif can you please explain to me why you think that NetWare doesnt need this check / define any longer, and why you removed it?
thanks, Gün.
