Branko Čibej wrote: > > "Violation of the Apache APR trademark"? For distributing modified APR > code? Are you serious? You are, among other things, explicitly > forbidding drop-in re-implementations which our license pretty much > expressly allows. -1, and if this is a snipe at that recent httpd-alpha > release, which "in light of current events" it appears to be, -2.
How so? Our license policy doesn't allow people to recycle our trademarks. And it says nothing about re-implementations at all, AIUI. They can do just about *anything* with the code by design, but not with the Apache APR name itself. The same will be true for Apache Subversion. Replacements can *never* use an Apache project name without explicit permission. Only Apache Software Foundation code can be called "Apache Foo".
