On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:09:47AM +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 18:06 -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: > > If you are bent on preserving this interface, does a new interface > > make sense, that allows the user to pass in the parameters, > > without passing in addresses? > > Nobody is bent on anything, although there were reasons to do it this > way (search the list - I cannot remember all the detauls). This is what > it is in 1.x, due to our versioning rules. > > Design your own and drop it into 2.0.
OK, do you like what I'm suggesting? An interface that takes a va_list, that behaves just like printf... If you like it, what would you like the name of the function to be called? Any pointers? Bob Rossi
