On Dec 17, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 17 Dec 2010, at 2:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Hold on, yeah, it does seem to still not like universal. >> >> But at least this is better than it was... > > A while back I asked Apple directly what their solution was, and they said > they amend the apr.h after the fact using this: > > http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/apr/apr-23/apr/files/fix-apr.h.ed > > While amending the apr.h file after the fact is obviously not the solution, > picking apart what they've done and building it into the apr.h.in should work.
iirc, the concept of using __LP64__ was nixed (iirc, about a year ago I had a large patch set which used that). r824818 and r824762 Not sure if that veto is still valid or not.
