On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 10:15 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > I think I'll need to work on a different approach.
Reverting r1237078 is the answer. We should not be hashing the hash, only the original strings, using the random seed. Obviously, folks using custom hash functions will have to come up with their own random seeding within those functions. -- Bojan
