On 27.08.2015 06:37, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 27.08.2015 05:46, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> Several years ago, we combined the functionality of apr and apr-util, >> and that library no longer draws in sub-dependencies until specific >> components are necessary (dbm providers, dbd providers, crypto >> providers etc). >> >> It seems overtime that we produce a release based on that effort, I'm >> offering in absence of other volunteers to prepare an -alpha candidate >> in mid-September. >> >> We don't work on the same clock as downstream distributors, so >> whatever effort we make in Sept won't see broad distribution until >> 2016. But if the httpd, svn and other consumers have successfully >> integrated with the 2.0 trunk/ development effort, it seems like this >> is a good time to begin to make that happen. >> >> Thoughts/comments/roadblocks/showstoppers? > Good move. > > There are a few long-outstanding patches from the SVN devs that I'd like > to get into the code first, so mid-September is a good goal.
On that topic, what would it take to take the Windows cmake build off 'experimental' status for 2.0 and remove the .dsp and .mak files? -- Brane
