On 26.11.2015 15:44, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Better if I address this Q to svn folks at the APR project :) > On Nov 26, 2015 08:39, "William A Rowe Jr" <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > >> Sounds right... Actually a fusion between svn_cstring_* and several >> existing ap_ and apr_ functions would be useful. >> >> SVN folk, any objection to APR appropriating these API's? 20/20 >> hindsight, is apr_cstring_ or shorter apr_cstr_ the way to go here? You >> all had to use the thing so I trust your preferences. Either expresses >> locale C in my mind, so they work for me.
Note that the svn_cstring* functions have *nothing* whatsoever to do with the "C" locale; they manipulate nul-terminated "C" strings, that's all. svn_cstring_casecmp depends on svn_ctype_casecmp; the svn_ctype functions are expected to only work on the ASCII subset. -- Brane >> On Nov 26, 2015 07:38, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >>> Yeah, SVN's 'svn_cstring_casecmp' and how it's used is >>> pretty much inline with my thoughts on how httpd would >>> use ours... >>> >>>> On Nov 25, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >>>> >>>> We have a set of similar comparison functions in Subversion. I’m pretty >>> sure we already had these in the time we still had ebcdic support on trunk. >>>> (We removed that support years ago, but the code should still live on a >>> branch) >>>> Bert >>>> >>>> From: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] >>>> Sent: woensdag 25 november 2015 22:55 >>>> To: httpd <d...@httpd.apache.org> >>>> Subject: Re: apr_token_* conclusions (was: Better casecmpstr[n]?) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Christophe JAILLET < >>> christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> just in case off, gnome as a set of function g_ascii_... >>>>> (see >>> https://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.28/glib-String-Utility-Functions.html#g-ascii-strcasecmp >>> ) >>>> Interesting, does anyone know offhand whether these perform the expected >>>> or the stated behavior under EBCDIC environments? >>>
