> On Nov 26, 2015, at 8:49 PM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote: > > In any case — I don't think anyone over at dev@s.a.o would object to APR > including those functions. We actually have a number of other, heh, > improvements on APR that we could "donate"; we just never really got > around to producing the necessary patches.
Yeah, svn is in the same situation as httpd. There are some functions would "ideally" would exist in APR, but APR doesn't move "fast enough" to allow that to happen, so both projects start collecting APR-like kruft after awhile... It certainly would be nice if there was someway to address that...
