> On Apr 5, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Nick Kew <n...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:53:30 -0500 > William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > >>>> Howbout a --with-experimental-timedlocks config option ? >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> although anyone toggling an -experimental flag is expected >>> to understand their resulting apr breaks binary compatibility. >> >> Or... do we stub them in all as APR_ENOTIMPL if the experimental >> flag is not given? > > Sounds like a plan. > > Keep API/ABI compatible either way, get the new code some exposure, > but only among users who ticked the disclaimer! >
/me like
