On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > I don't think that a remark is strong enough here. I would like to > see this parameter either added to a new apr_reslist_create_ex or if > we want to stick with apr_reslist_fifo_set it should return an error > if elements are already in the reslist.
r1828492, I kept it as a helper rather than _create_ex() because: - it's already how settings seem to be added there (timeout, ...) - _create() has a substantial number of args already :/ - _create_ex() are definitive extensions or may end up in endless discussions for the next function name when/should an _ex_ex() is/be needed :) Thanks for the review! Regards, Yann.