On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:13 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Other options:
>> 2. Reverse the order in the ring when apr_reslist_fifo_set is called.
>> Of course both options require a lock.
> Here's an odd idea. What if the *traversal* were reversed based on the lifo 
> bit,
> and the structure itself remained static?
> 3. Interpret the fifo/lifo flag as an insertion mechanic, so previous fifo
> items are returned in original sequence, once all later lifo items are
> retrieved.

Oh, I missed your message before replying to RĂ¼diger.
I'm afraid it'd be a bit over-engineered for a setting unlikely to
change in the lifetime of the reslist, or do you foresee a real need
for this?

Reply via email to