William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> writes: > Confusing... which patch is missing? > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1808457 > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1829962 > > It should not be possible at this point to need 1.x specific code > that wouldn't correspond to a trunk commit.
I think that r1829962 should be treated as a follow-up to r1808457 (where I missed one calling site of apr_thread_mutex_unlock() in buffer.c). In other words, they should either be backported together, or not backported at all. Since this change is a relatively minor optimization (not a fix), I would think that it might make sense to keep it just in trunk. Thanks, Evgeny Kotkov
