Thanks for the explanation. Your OP said nothing about that, so was "hard to follow".
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:19 AM William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > It seems we have a lot of revert activity on trunk, relating to OpenSSL > init, which is becoming hard to follow. It would be good if we start off > major changes on the dev@ list for discussion first, which should help > avoid some code churn. > > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018, 05:17 Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What is this email about? >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:43 PM William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> >> wrote: >> >>> *Change Process* >>> >>> Most changes (bug fixes and minor, commonsense feature adds) do not >>> require review. Developers are encouraged to request review for: >>> >>> - Large changes affecting many files >>> - Changes to interfaces >>> - Changes that commit APR to one option out of an exclusive set >>> - Any change the developer wants a second (or Nth) opinion on >>> >>> Anyone may retroactively cause someone's change to be reviewed by >>> requesting review after it was committed, and at their discretion may >>> revert the change until it is approved. >>> >>> The above process is called "Commit Then Review" (or CTR). As of this >>> time, the group does not see a need to ever use a "Review Then Commit" >>> (RTC) process. >>> >>> >>>