> On 25 Aug 2018, at 15:03, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote:
> I dont't remember the outcome of the discussions, but are any of the 
> following three reslist changes reasonable for 1.6 backport?

IMHO No.  If it ain't broke, don't fix it in 1.6.
Changes that call for non-trivial or production testing belong in 1.7,
along with the crypto updates and possibly the json from amongst
what's been happening on trunk.

Nick Kew

Reply via email to