Here's what I have, it is apparently the dev@ list...

Mailing-List: contact dev-h...@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:dev@apr.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-h...@apr.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@apr.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list <dev@apr.apache.org>
Received: (qmail 60305 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2018 12:33:02 -0000
Received: from Unknown (HELO buildbot-vm2.apache.org) (62.210.60.225)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:33:02 +0000
Received: from buildbot-vm2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
buildbot-vm2.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at buildbot-vm2.apache.org) with
ESMTP id D0321A0110 for <dev@apr.apache.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:32:58
+0000 (UTC)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:32:58 +0000
Subject: buildbot failure in
  on apr-x64-macosx-trunk
From: build...@apache.org
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Message-Id: <20180831123258.d0321a0...@buildbot-vm2.apache.org>

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder apr-x64-macosx-trunk
while building . Full details are available at:
    https://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-x64-macosx-trunk/builds/159

Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/

Buildslave for this Build: svn-x64-macosx-dgvrs

Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler scheduler named 'on-apr-commit'
triggered this build
Build Source Stamp: [branch apr/apr/trunk] 1839755
Blamelist: ylavic

BUILD FAILED: failed Test

Sincerely,
 -The Buildbot



On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:04 AM Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:29 PM William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I presume you are subscribed to the commits list, which broadcasts our
> CI results?
> >
> > Hmm, I'm supposed to be subscribed to commits@ list but somehow I
> > didn't receive this one (yet?).
> > Or is it a special list?
>
> I don't get it either!
>

Reply via email to