On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:01 AM Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:06 AM William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > wrote: > > > > Any other concerns ahead of 1.7.0? > > There are some backports I need to revert, the dynamic linking (as > opposed to dynamic loading) of apr_crypto libraries -1'ed by Graham > (see discussion in r1833359 and r1833421 threads), and thus the new > PRNG stuff depending on a single library init/deinit point in APR and > (hopefully) as much direct as possible calls to the underlying crypto > lib primitives (i.e. no insane indirections). > My question was entirely limited to apr, I hadn't yet considered pushing for an apr-util release. The concerns you and Graham are discussing, Nick's interest in libxml2 and my interest in simplifying win32+iconv without GPL libiconv all fall into the later. Perhaps resolving apr 1.7 this month (what I've raised), plus targeting about a month from now to move forward with apr-util 1.7 would be helpful to nudge some of these efforts along?