On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 5:06 PM William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> With several new features added to the 1.7 branch, the fixes to the > Netware locking we had deferred, and the proposed correction of > SIGUSR2, I'm wondering what we see as remaining obstacles. > > Do we want to do something about de-prioritizing sysv semaphores > on linux by default with the 1.7.0 release? > AIUI only Yann and I are interested in this problem set, perhaps because others long ago hacked around it in autoconf overrides? In any case, this is the last issue that interested me. I didn't see any issues raised w.r.t. APR (not APR-util) for a tag of 1.7.0. Barring any other distraction, about 10am CDT this Friday I'd expect to tag a first candidate as 1.7.0 and see if that flies. I'd love for many of you to give the current state of ^/apr/apr/branches/1.7.x/ a whirl and report (or fix) any irregularities. I'm not proposing any tag of APR-util at this time. Cheers, Bill
