I assumed this as a trunk/2.0 only proposal. Is my assumption wrong? Regards
Rüdiger On 12/7/21 9:46 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > If you're talking 1.7, then as long as an apu_legacy.h header is included by > $appropriate with #define symbols mapping APU_FOO to > APR_FOO. This header could be removed in apr 2.0, and user apps expected to > s/APU/APR/ ... the 1.x ABI would need simple apu_foo() > wrappers around apr_foo() > > Cheers, > -g > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:50 AM Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org > <mailto:mt...@apache.org>> wrote: > > Since apr-util API is now part of APR > I propose to rename all that legacy APU_FOO to APR_FOO > > > > Regards > -- > ^TM >
