On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 3:38 PM William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 7:43 AM Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 08/12/2021 08:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > I assumed this as a trunk/2.0 only proposal. Is my assumption wrong? > > > > Yes, trunk only. > > Just a simple copy/paste leftover cleanup, mostly for internals > > Within that scope, yes, make it happen. Temp macros for the lifespan > of 2.0.x seems appropriate, > ending at release 2.1.0 > Given the clarification this is for 2.x, then I'd say: skip the temp macros. They couldn't be removed in a point release anyways. That said, I'd be +0.5 for an "apu_legacy.h" to assist with people porting 1.x code to 2.x. Downstream users would just throw in that #include into appropriate source files, and call it a day. That header would be super easy to maintain going forwards (ie. rarely, if *ever* change), so wouldn't really be a maintenance burden. Cheers, -g
