On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:38 PM, James William Dumay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Forgot to add: I propose that the next release of Archiva will be > 1.1-milestone1. As each major feature is completed, we increment that number > and the last milestone becomes 1.1.0.
Why? What's so special about 1.1? Version numbers are free, we can make more. And there is no marketing department involved here. :) One of the reasons we made this change for Struts is that it makes no sense in a volunteer organization to have to re-do a release and vote (a non-trivial amount of work and time) just to change the filename on a distribution. (Assuming 1.1-beta-3 is good, you have to re-do the process to get it changed to 1.1.) If it's milestones I'd prefer 1.1-M1 to spelling out milestone. Or just go with 1.1-beta-1 since that's what people are used to. That's it from me, at this point I'll defer to the people actually doing the work on releases. :) Anyone else have an opinion? (And for the record, I was not awake at 1AM. :) For some reason the mac didn't shut down when I closed it..) -- Wendy
