Will you rename 1.1.1 to 1.1? I don't like the idea to release a 1.1.1 without a 1.1 before.
Emmanuel On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Based on all the discussion, my preference is to cancel the vote, not > publish 1.1, and just move on with 1.1.1 soon. > > I don't want to announce it but then advise people to wait for 1.1.1. > And putting it in the repo/on the mirrors _without_ announcing it (as > suggested on irc this evening) doesn't make sense to me. > > -- > Wendy > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > Below is a summary of what has been discussed and agreed upon in the IRC > > earlier today: > > 1. Still push 1.1 out and release 1.1.1 right after > > 2. Note the localhost issue in the 1.1 release notes so users are aware > of > > it > > 3. There are 3 new issues that will be included in 1.1.1, which are: > > - [MRM-870] - addRepositoryToGroup.action => AbstractMethodError on > > DeferredDocumentImpl.getXmlStandalone() > > - [MRM-871] - jetty.host and jetty.port properties are set by default > in > > jetty.xml preventing user from using other hostname if user is not aware > of > > these properties > > - [MRM-730] - Index/Search by class, method or package name >
