Thus, we unrelease the 1.1 in Jira, we move 1.1.1 in it and we relaunch the 1.1 release when we are ready ?
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hehe, I *thought* I was having deja vu... we did already agree to follow > that style, not the httpd one. [1] > > Though that was also in the context of milestones, and in the end we ended > up getting all the way to 1.1. Does anyone think we need to reconsider in > light of that, and the issue with the release? > > I'm fine with either style. After due consideration, the only thing I'm not > in favour of is releasing/announcing the binaries of the current 1.1 build > since it would cause too much confusion. > > Cheers, > Brett > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/xijhr4tq5ktfu33z > > > On 11/07/2008, at 6:24 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > I'm also against the idea to have a 1.1.1 without 1.1. It was the coice we >> made for the release process (eclipse like vs httpd like) >> The only blocker thing I see with the actual 1.1 is the problem to merge >> metadata. >> I didn't check if it is fixed but if this was done I'm in favor to include >> it in 1.1 >> If we don't know when we'll be able to fix it, we continue the release and >> we document the issue. >> >> Arnaud >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Emmanuel Venisse < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Will you rename 1.1.1 to 1.1? >>> I don't like the idea to release a 1.1.1 without a 1.1 before. >>> >>> Emmanuel >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Based on all the discussion, my preference is to cancel the vote, not >>>> publish 1.1, and just move on with 1.1.1 soon. >>>> >>>> I don't want to announce it but then advise people to wait for 1.1.1. >>>> And putting it in the repo/on the mirrors _without_ announcing it (as >>>> suggested on irc this evening) doesn't make sense to me. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Wendy >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>> >>>>> Below is a summary of what has been discussed and agreed upon in the >>>>> >>>> IRC >>> >>>> earlier today: >>>>> 1. Still push 1.1 out and release 1.1.1 right after >>>>> 2. Note the localhost issue in the 1.1 release notes so users are aware >>>>> >>>> of >>>> >>>>> it >>>>> 3. There are 3 new issues that will be included in 1.1.1, which are: >>>>> - [MRM-870] - addRepositoryToGroup.action => AbstractMethodError on >>>>> DeferredDocumentImpl.getXmlStandalone() >>>>> - [MRM-871] - jetty.host and jetty.port properties are set by >>>>> >>>> default >>> >>>> in >>>> >>>>> jetty.xml preventing user from using other hostname if user is not >>>>> >>>> aware >>> >>>> of >>>> >>>>> these properties >>>>> - [MRM-730] - Index/Search by class, method or package name >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > -- > Brett Porter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > >
