After javamail update I get it to work, and I also get logs in archiva.log :D So as a summary - on tomcat 5.5 javamail > 1.2 seems to be required, - migration from a 1.1 user database is broken - some bad component.xml metadata are repported by the spring-plexus bridge
The 2nd one is a restriction that must be documented in the release note as this is not easy to know what's wrong when the app didn't start. As I really have fiew time to test the release, and even less to contribute, here is my +0 On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:02 PM, nicolas de loof <[email protected]>wrote: > My tomcat has mail.jar 1.2 in common/libbut this version allready defines > a public InternetAddress( String ) AFAIK. > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm using 1.4. >> >> >> On 24/03/2009, at 10:25 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: >> >> Archiva starts with a fresh new user database. >>> But I can't create the admin : >>> java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method >>> javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.<init>(Ljava/lang/String;Z) >>> >>> Seems my tomcat instance doesn't have the expected javamail version >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM, nicolas de loof >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space :-/ >>>> Seems i've made too much start/stop tests - This time I will need some >>>> help >>>> from my system admin :) >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Are you able to check if it works with a clean one? I did try the >>>>> upgrade >>>>> earlier, but I wonder if anyone else is testing an upgrade from an >>>>> older >>>>> version? >>>>> >>>>> - Brett >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:04 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm sharing the database from my existing Archiva 1.1.1 instance >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 9:49 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is fully repeatable, and the app is deployed on a private test >>>>>>> >>>>>>> context >>>>>>>> path, so no request is coming in yet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does the test set up have an existing users database or a clean >>>>>>> users >>>>>>> database? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Brett >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Brett Porter >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>> Brett Porter >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> -- >> Brett Porter >> [email protected] >> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >> >> >
