-1
I know it is a little late in the process, but I want to vote against
releasing 1.2.
MRM-1154 blocks all users of Maven 2.1.x from using Archiva since our
metadata merging barfs on the xml schema attributes that were slipped
into the 2.1.x format.
It might also be wise for us to ship a 1.1.4 release that allows
compatibility for those who are sticking to the current stable release
event after 1.2 is GA.
Thoughts?
James
nicolas de loof wrote:
After javamail update I get it to work, and I also get logs in archiva.log
:D
So as a summary
- on tomcat 5.5 javamail> 1.2 seems to be required,
- migration from a 1.1 user database is broken
- some bad component.xml metadata are repported by the spring-plexus bridge
The 2nd one is a restriction that must be documented in the release note as
this is not easy to know what's wrong when the app didn't start.
As I really have fiew time to test the release, and even less to contribute,
here is my +0
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:02 PM, nicolas de loof
<[email protected]>wrote:
My tomcat has mail.jar 1.2 in common/libbut this version allready defines
a public InternetAddress( String ) AFAIK.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Brett Porter<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm using 1.4.
On 24/03/2009, at 10:25 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
Archiva starts with a fresh new user database.
But I can't create the admin :
java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method
javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.<init>(Ljava/lang/String;Z)
Seems my tomcat instance doesn't have the expected javamail version
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM, nicolas de loof
<[email protected]>wrote:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space :-/
Seems i've made too much start/stop tests - This time I will need some
help
from my system admin :)
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Brett Porter<[email protected]>
wrote:
Are you able to check if it works with a clean one? I did try the
upgrade
earlier, but I wonder if anyone else is testing an upgrade from an
older
version?
- Brett
On 24/03/2009, at 10:04 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
I'm sharing the database from my existing Archiva 1.1.1 instance
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Brett Porter<[email protected]>
wrote:
On 24/03/2009, at 9:49 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
This is fully repeatable, and the app is deployed on a private test
context
path, so no request is coming in yet.
Does the test set up have an existing users database or a clean
users
database?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[email protected]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
--
Brett Porter
[email protected]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
--
Brett Porter
[email protected]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
