On 11/02/2010, at 6:21 PM, Deng Ching wrote: > For documentation in general - what would others prefer? Should we continue >> to use Confluence (and I can move these across), or would you like to >> continue these? >> > > I prefer the wiki for proposals and development docs, but I'm also fine with > incorporating it to the site. My only condition is that they are together in > one place and not scattered in different locations..
Agreed, and also that wherever we put them makes sure they don't get left out of date :) What is behind your preference for the wiki? My main reason for wanting to use APT was for offline editing and keeping history in subversion, as well as it giving a slight encouragement for writing good Javadocs. But it is certainly more time consuming to build and view than in Confluence. I finished doing what I was planning to for now anyway, and is published here: http://archiva.apache.org/ref/1.4-SNAPSHOT/ >> I intend to propose this for trunk after these are done, so please take a >> look through the code changes if you get a chance. I don't want this to be a >> 'code bomb' nobody understands :) >> > > I attempted to take look at the branch earlier this year but got > side-tracked with other things. Sorry about that.. I'll find some time to go > over the branch in the next few days :) Let me know if you need any pointers. I found some of the audit log tests are not passing so I may not have re-implemented it consistently. I'll take a further look before proposing a merge. - Brett -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
