On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 11/02/2010, at 6:21 PM, Deng Ching wrote: > > > For documentation in general - what would others prefer? Should we > continue > >> to use Confluence (and I can move these across), or would you like to > >> continue these? > >> > > > > I prefer the wiki for proposals and development docs, but I'm also fine > with > > incorporating it to the site. My only condition is that they are together > in > > one place and not scattered in different locations.. > > Agreed, and also that wherever we put them makes sure they don't get left > out of date :) > +1 > > What is behind your preference for the wiki? My main reason for wanting to > use APT was for offline editing and keeping history in subversion, as well > as it giving a slight encouragement for writing good Javadocs. But it is > certainly more time consuming to build and view than in Confluence. > I like the formatting in the wiki and also being able to preview my changes, I guess I'm just used to that :) Using the APT is fine for me too as it has it's own advantages like when working offline as you've pointed out :) > > I finished doing what I was planning to for now anyway, and is published > here: http://archiva.apache.org/ref/1.4-SNAPSHOT/ > It's looking good :) -Deng > > >> I intend to propose this for trunk after these are done, so please take > a > >> look through the code changes if you get a chance. I don't want this to > be a > >> 'code bomb' nobody understands :) > >> > > > > I attempted to take look at the branch earlier this year but got > > side-tracked with other things. Sorry about that.. I'll find some time to > go > > over the branch in the next few days :) > > Let me know if you need any pointers. I found some of the audit log tests > are not passing so I may not have re-implemented it consistently. I'll take > a further look before proposing a merge. > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > >
